Survival Score Reward
The Survival Score Reward evaluates a borrower’s ability to avoid liquidations on any indexed third-party platform relative to the rest of the market, rewarding or subtracting points proportional to the “liquidation density” on a given day. Unlike the Daily Score Reward, which looks only at the previous 120 days of borrowing experience on ARCx Credit, the Survival Score Reward considers the borrowing experience of a wallet address over its entire lifetime outside of ARCx Credit. A borrower with previous experience on a selection of third party borrowing platforms will have a DeFi Credit Score between 0 and 760 based on this Score component alone. The Survival Score Reward therefore establishes the minimum bound for the DeFi Credit Score, where the only way a borrower can reach 999 is to borrow on ARCx (by virtue of the Daily Score Reward).
The rules of the Survival Score Reward should reflect the following:
- A good borrower is one who:
- Avoids liquidations during periods of high volatility.
- Recognizes that their position may be in danger and reacts appropriately to avoid liquidation.
- A bad borrower is one who:
- Does not avoid liquidation during periods of high volatility.
- Does not recognize that their position is in danger and fails to act in a timely manner to avoid liquidation.
Additionally, the following points are taken into consideration:
- A borrower who has been liquidated previously should not score as high as a borrower who has never been liquidated. The top reward should be given to the borrower who has never been liquidated.
- The impact of a liquidation is dependent on the market. We want to reward borrowers who avoid liquidation in uncertain markets more than borrowers who avoid liquidation in strong markets. This is almost counter-intuitive, since sudden market crashes catch borrowers off-guard, while liquidating in a bull market seems like a borrower being careless. However, we want to recognize borrowers who avoided liquidation when many others did not. This means weighing liquidations in falling markets more heavily than liquidations in strong markets.
- A borrower must have been borrowing to be awarded any points. Hence, top scoring borrowers are guaranteed to have been borrowing the longest. This works to reward experience.
The liquidation density is defined as follows:
First, we calculate the number of liquidations on each day over the history of a given 3rd party platform (in the example below we show Aave V2 liquidations on Ethereum).
We can now define “liquidation density” using a centered moving sum of the liquidation count over 7 days. It is centered to account for eminently approaching liquidations and reward users who risk-adjust prior to a market downturn. These values are normalized to the range [0, 1].
The liquidation density is defined separately for each 3rd party data source.
This liquidation density can be used to construct a points system. On any day, a Borrower is rewarded with points proportional to the liquidation density if they do not get liquidated, and lose points proportional to the liquidation density if they do get liquidated on that day.
Mathematically, the reward is constructed as follows.
Define the “liquidation density”,
, at any point in time,
, as a value between [0, 1]. Let
be an index denoting the date. So,
corresponds to the starting date of the calculation (
in the figure above). So,
is the liquidation density on the date
Next, we define a “liquidation index” as a Boolean value for whether the borrower was liquidated on the date
Similarly, we define an “eligibility index”, as a Boolean showing whether the borrower was borrowing sufficient amounts of debt on day
. The threshold for this is set to $500:
Then we calculate the daily impact,
The first term is the “positive” impact the borrower receives for borrowing on day
. The second term is the “negative” impact the borrower receives for being liquidated on day
In the above equation,
is a a scalar added to the liquidation density in the negative component. This ensures the borrower will always be penalized for a liquidation, even when there has been no other liquidations in the market. We are using
represents the width of the rolling window used in the sum of liquidation counts. In the present case,
The figure below may be helpful in understanding the magnitudes of the two components in the above equation (note the different y axis scales of the two panels).
We then compute the sum of the daily impact over all days in the past
This method satisfies the following:
- A more experienced borrower (held debt for longer) has the potential to grow a higher score.
- Liquidations negatively impact the total. The larger the density of liquidations at the time of liquidation, the larger the impact of that liquidation. Conversely, avoiding a liquidation during these periods rewards the borrower more.
- The more “liquidation peaks” the borrow survives, the higher their score will be. A borrower who only survives one peak will score lower than a borrower who survives two, and so on.
A borrower receives a separate score for each 3rd party lending platform they have borrowed on. This is limited to platforms we have so far indexed. So to compute their final Survival Score, we combine the individual scores to a value between 0 and 760. This Survival Score is then added into the DeFi Credit Score.